Skip to main content
Media for Freedom
Making Democratic Socialism Relatable
Dr. Yossef Ben-Meir
Dr. Yossef Ben-Meir
The phrase “Democratic Socialism” continues to find its way into current national and political discourse of the United States. Vermont Senator and Presidential candidate Bernie Sanders embraces the term, while his opponents, both from within his own party as well as on the Republican aisle, using its label as a bit of an albatross. Mr. Sanders’ own description of the philosophical, theoretical, and pragmatic applications of Democratic Socialism have yet to lay the weaponizing of this concept to rest. In his emphasis on the universality of rights, be they environmental, economic, health-related, educative, or concerning human dignity, he leaves out the primary distinction of Democratic Socialism. If properly conveyed, he could directly appeal to even its most vehement opponents at present.
Indeed, classic Democratic Socialism, at its essential core and manner of societal organization is riveted upon this basic premise: local people exert control over their own affairs without the central level of government making determinations on the pathways, priorities, and planning of communities and sub-national jurisdictions. The Democratic Socialist notion, therefore, is not all that distinct from the basis of the United States’ Federalist system and the birth and fundamental identity of the Republican Party.
Let us take a case and point. In a recent Town Hall, Senator Sanders was asked what specifically he would do in order to combat the effects of climate change visiting upon marginalized communities along Maryland’s seaboard. A Democratic Socialist response to such a question – one which a significant swath of Republican Party members may also appreciate hearing – would adjudicate that to effectively combat climate change and take measures in a specific area, residents of the impacted community with relevant local government officials, business owners, and members of civil society come together to protect that location against the hardship they are experiencing. Democratic Socialism would advocate pivoting some of the responsibility of the national level away from being the focal point of decisive action and instead also shift to a supporting role for local decision-makers.
Yet, in his answer, Senator Sanders entirely emphasized national strategies, including battling fossil fuel companies and heralding a new era of renewable energy, along with other certainly necessary measures. It is responses like as these, however, that can be taken as fodder for those who wield the term Democratic Socialism to scare their listeners. The public and likely many in the Republican Party would feel a greater sense of control over and certainly less threatened by Democratic Socialism if it was expressed more closely to its true meaning; that is, a high level skepticism toward central planning and an unbridled emphasis on local community decision-making on matters of greatest communal importance.
Let us take another matter: the restoration of and investment in infrastructure. Both major political parties in the United States have conceived substantial infrastructural bills to include massive investments in large-scale projects, such as water, energy, and transport modernization. These certainly have their critical place in the betterment and political discourse of our society. Nonetheless, a Democratic Socialist perspective on infrastructural investments would contend that governmental expenditures ought to spotlight a far greater number of projects at the local level with smaller sized budgets, rather than fewer projects requiring much greater amounts of capital. Upon hearing this alternative portrayal of an infrastructural program, those who may traditionally fear the Democratic Socialist agenda will come to see that its translation into reality is in fact under their own determination and management, resulting in a decrease of their anxiety and fear.
And, even in regard to large-scale big-budget infrastructural initiatives, a Democratic Socialist would emphasize that identification of such considerably sized projects would heavily come from federations of local associations that support one another, unite, and still maintain their own autonomy. Federations tier upward in order to gain a greater scope of shared local priorities. This is to say that large scale projects are also able to be reflective of the will of local communities through the federation of their own associations into broadly representative groups of increasing numbers of people. Efforts like these put forth a more precise description of what actually constitutes bottom-up change and movements, although these processes are rarely applied effectively, even by those who espouse them.
When explaining Democratic Socialism to the American people, particularly those who are highly skeptical proponents of this political philosophy, one ought to emphasize what it most truly is, a commensurate of an American ideal. This epitome of the American character asserts that the people, when faced with matters of concern and affect, must rely on the fundamental assumption that it is they, through their direct participation, who are in the best position to make decisions for the future of their jurisdictions.
Dr. Yossef Ben-Meir is an American sociologist who resides in Marrakech, Morocco.
Fri, 02/21/2020 - 21:38
Returning to Work During COVID-19
Testing for Covid-19
Life is not only meant to remain alive
I Love Cape May
Pandemic is a grim reminder
Coronavirus, Beyond I love myself this evening
My life in New York City During Covid-19 Pandemic, a poem
Save and investing more to obtain increases in productivity.
Social Transformation And Poverty?
Why an economic policy needs to be regenerated?
Love Brings Only Love
A bad economic system/political will lack adequate incentives
What is morally wrong with discrimination? A Kantian analysis
How Did We Get To This Dire State Of Affairs?
Gender stereotypes plaguing the pandemic response
Building a Definition of Development
A vaccine for COVID-19: So near and yet so far
COVID-19 and Returning to work
Never say die: Disability is not about inability
Solidarity in the Face of COVID-19
Less Transparency Will Worsen the Pandemic
The Pandemic Of Racism In America
Public services are essential to COVID-19 response
'It’s Time To Tame Erdogan
MFF Old Website Contents
Love, Forgiveness, Kindness, Democracy, Human Rights, Freedom, Peace and Literature
To promote freedom, democracy, anti-terrorism, Literature, women rights, public health, peace and empowerment (http://mediaforfreedom.com) has a strong role to play. Its activities support Peace, Public health, Democracy, Freedom, Human rights, Women/Children, development in societies undergoing crisis and changes. In fact, mediaforfreedom has set objectives like research on contemporary issues, conduct regular media watch, networking with relevant organizations and training for journalist and so on. The contributors are fully responsible for their articles, news and do not represent the views of mediaforfreedom.com. Contributors and editor will not be paid. Articles, News and Press releases should be directed to the editor to Kamala B. Sarup at email@example.com
Today's popular content
An HIV vaccine will never work in isolation
New global tourism initiative to ‘steer industry onto a truly sustainable path’ – UN
The 2nd Asia Pacific Feminist Forum
We have no plan B, we have to get rid of this virus'- new head of UN Ebola mission
Ban reaffirms support for peace on Korean Peninsula
2015 Can and must be time for global action
Global Compact to help end poverty
Women’s Political Participation
UN to host new round of talks among Libyan parties with view to ending crisis
Ebola vaccines show ‘acceptable safety
Development and education reform
Haiti's earthquake victims, looks ahead to brighter future
Respectful And Kind Behavior?
Women managers, urges greater efforts for workforce equality
Find us on Facebook
Find us on Twitter
Tweets by @mffmedia
Find us on Google+